---------------------------------------- ARTICLE ----------------------------------------
RAPED BY AFRICAN
Skellefteå
Västerbotten County
32,775 inhabitants - 2010
SWEDEN Deported but had to stop and rape anyway Published October 29, 2015 at 15:17
Free Times has previously written about the case of the African were arrested and charged with rape cafe in Skellefteå. It has afterwards proved to be the man who claimed to be from Mali, which had previously been convicted of assault, should have been expelled from Sweden after having been rejected their asylum application. Rape victim is a Swedish woman born in Västerbotten County who suffers from Down syndrome. The current Sunday in September gave the woman out on the town in order to "clear the mind". In the center, she met in the African, who invited her for a cup of coffee at Espresso House. According to an investigative memorandum in rape case shows that African applied for asylum in Sweden for exactly three years ago. Eleven months later announced the rejection and 2014 and won the decision becomes final. A request to take part in the investigation was added to Skellefteå District Court after the prosecution had been brought. A judge at the district court therefore took on the task of confidentiality examine the police investigation. The intention was to remove or mask sensitive parts of the material covered by confidentiality. But some documents masks were not - apparently because of oversight. - I did of course also immediately. I called to her counsel and told him what had happened, explains alderman. - It has been the understanding. It's something that absolutely never happen. SWEDISH ---------------------------------------- COMMENT
Unidentified African 'asylum seeker' is housed in 'asylum seeker accommodation' by the Swedish Migration Agency.
This unidentified African alien is then effectively discharged among the domestic Swedish population, as this accommodation is not, in fact, secure accommodation that one would expect such aliens to be housed in, for the purposes of protection of the general public, identification, risk assessment, other assessment, disease control, and so on.
The identity of this alien is unknown, as he represented himself as being from Mali but is, according to the authorities, more likely to be from Gambia.
While the Swedish authorities are incapable of positively identifying the alien in question (and, undoubtedly, many others such as this case), they are also incapable of deporting him, according to my understanding of the situation.
Positively identifying such alien immigrants is next to impossible, due to arrival without identification or prior destruction of identification by same.
Therefore, unidentifiable and unauthorised alien immigrants are next to impossible to deport.
The result is that these aliens are then kept at taxpayer expense -- whether that be in so-called 'asylum accommodation', immigrant detention centres (which is not the case in Sweden at present), or in prison for crimes committed upon arrival (which appears all too common).
This unidentified and unauthorised African alien, culturally and otherwise 'enriching' Swedish society, gained an assault conviction to his 'credit' prior to committing rape.
But that did not make a difference to the Swedish authorities, who still did not segregate the convicted unauthorised alien for the protection and well-being of the Swedish population.
Nor was he segregated from the Swedish population when he was denied asylum.
Despite the fact that those denied asylum also pose a clear and demonstrable risk to the Swedish domestic population, as there is nothing to lose and everything to gain by committing crime: either to discharge hostilities upon Swedish society as revenge for rejection from Swedish society, and/or to ensure continued housing and material provision of needs by Swedish taxpayers.
So that is three (3) occasions on which this unauthorised alien could and should have been placed in secure accommodation but was not: 1) upon arrival. 2) upon having committed a crime (assault). 3 upon having been refused asylum.
As a result of what is undoubtedly Swedish government and authorities' negligence (in terms of practical and moral responsibility to the domestic Swedish public), an extremely vulnerable Swedish member of the public was raped by an unauthorised, unidentified, convicted criminal, African alien that was permitted to roam among the unsuspecting and vulnerable domestic population.
The IKEA murders were committed by unauthorised aliens who were denied asylum -- and the victims were targeted because they were Swedish: native Swedish mother and son, butchered by Africans in Sweden in broad daylight.
Variations of above nightmare scenario are constantly replayed, in some form or other, in Sweden and throughout Europe.
So what are the solutions?
One would think that a sensible government would:
1. Create undesirable conditions, so as to repel rather than to attract and invite border incursions and alien invasions.
2. Institute border closure and strict border controls, preferably controlled by armed military personnel authorised to use all necessary force to repel invasion.
3. Establish secure lock-up facilities to house (a) unauthorised aliens and (b) aliens earmarked for deportation.
4. Establish fast-track removal of unauthorised aliens and, if this is not viable given identification issues and other technicalities, to establish comprehensive policies for (a) the strict prevention of alien entry of any description and (b) exceedingly unpleasant detention for those that breach the barriers.
5. Make arrangements for deportation of all such unauthorised aliens to a willing (& most likely impoverished) country that would accept and assume all responsibility for such alien transfers, in exchange for monetary compensation, goods, arms or whatever they wish, on the basis that out is better (and less costly in every imaginable way) than in.
6. Collectively take measures to prevent any landings of unauthorised aliens on European soil.
After securing national boundaries and doing all that can be done to protect domestic populations and to discourage national incursions, the main objective must be to collectively divert prospective alien arrivals from European waters and thus from European shores. That is absolutely key.
Of course, this will not happen.
Aside from ridiculous national integrity destroying international conventions that must be scrapped forthwith (but won't be), the politicians that run these Western European countries are indifferent to the plight of the domestic populations, indifferent to the enormous costs to the public (financial and social) and indifferent to the destruction of their own societies and demise of their own people.
One can only assume that these politicians and technocrats have other plans, and we can see that whatever those plans entail, it involves actively enabling the slow genocide of their own people.
Note also - this costs the taxpayer every which way: 1. Sorting, accommodating, identifying, testing, medical, food etc & welfare payments upon arrival. 2. Further accommodation & provision upon rejection of asylum. 3. Victims of crime costs, administrative legal, social welfare, law enforcement authorities and agencies costs (manpower & other). 4. Medical, psychological and compensation costs to victims of crime. 5. Ongoing costs of incarceration etc. 6. Extensive costs of deportation. 7. Ongoing costs of accommodation & provision for rejected unauthorised aliens, that cannot be deported due to technical issues that cannot be resolved for years, if ever. 8. For those difficult to dislodge, a lifetime of accommodation, unemployment benefits, law suits re deportation etc costs, reproduction related costs, family reunion costs, 'integration' costs, supervision costs, medical costs, educational costs .... etc etc etc ...
And this is just what I could quickly come up with off the top of my head.
Stop to think about how extensive these costs really are per person, when each person is allotted up to an extra eight (8) additional 'reunion' family members that the taxpayer can expect to also support (in Germany, away), along with provision of all of the above for issue (ie children) from multiple, generally stay-at-home wives, and all the generations that ensue in segregation and absence of assimilation thereafter.
So the average European taxpayer is funding what amounts to multi-generational progressive destruction of their own societies and people (and getting indebted for generations to come for this 'privilege') .
Yippeeeee! What's not to like, right?
---------------------------------------- Europa-Evropa ᛞ
SWEDEN
BUTCHERED
in IKEA
By Sara Malm for MailOnline
ᛞ
|
Wednesday 11 November 2015
Sweden, Skellefteå, Västerbotten County - Down Syndrome Victim - Raped in Cafe by 20-Year-Old, Assault-Convicted, African Who Was Denied Asylum
Labels:
African,
Asylum Rejection,
Crime,
Govt Negligence,
Guna Graufelds,
IKEA,
Knife,
Murder,
Rape,
Skellefteå,
Sweden,
Swedish Migration Agency,
Västerbotten,
Västmanland,
Victim Vulnerable