| ---------------------------------------- ARTICLE  ----------------------------------------
Manufactured 'Refugee Crisis' - Invasion of Europe - US-Anglo Strategy to Weaken Ally Europe
SOURCE
----------------------------------------https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTDlY4o23XA [Subtitles by New Insight] TITLE Nikolai Starikov: Explains Who Is Behind Europe's Refugee Crisis ---------------------------------------- TRANSCRIPT [for quotation purposes, confirm subtitles / audio] Nikolai Starikov: Have there been previous waves of migration into Europe? Interviewer: Of course there have. Starting from the 1960s, even in the 1950s. Nikolai Starikov: Back then they came from Yugoslavia, from various countries. Later from Turkey they came to Germany. There have been many waves. In reality, it was primarily for economic reasons, sometimes there were political issues, too. For example, an anti-US revolution took place in Iran. All the corrupt Iranians -- the secret police, the local oligarchs -- fled to London, to Europe, and so on. There have always been political asylum-seekers. But there has always been the rule in the EU and in individual states that if you are seeking political asylum -- I stress POLITICAL, because you cannot seek economic asylum -- then you have to prove you are facing danger. Some of our own white-ribbon folks also fled to Holland after 2012. One of them died their, if you remember. They all declared they were in terrible danger from the blood-thirsty regime, and they must be allowed to stay. There is a procedure in place. What we see here is that there is no procedure, no state even. All of a sudden, the border guards, the customs service, all of the state functions dealing with these migrants, the issuing, or not, of documents -- they all vanished. The result is a rather strange picture: you can jump on some sea transport, sail from the coast of Africa to Europe, you'll hardly be asked for documents or whether you're a political asylum-seeker or not political. They'll do nothing to you. After that, you can do as you like. You can make demands, start a fight, smash things up. You can proceed on foot, or whoever they get from Lampedusa to Budapest. In Budapest they cause chaos: seizing the train station, smashing up the trains, and demanding to be transported to some destination. Think about it. Previously a person would arrive and say, "I request asylum." You know there is a state, you make a request to the EU. You can't demand anything. Let me give you a little historical example, which maybe isn't about refugees but about demands. The situation was this: when Vladimir Ilyich Lenin very much wanted to travel on the sealed train, ie return from Switzerland to Russia, after its capture by the February Revolution, he used all means, tried every way. He wanted to travel pretending to be a deaf-mute Swede. He wrote that England wouldn't allow him through. He tried to get on an aircraft, a hot air balloon. He tried everything -- nothing succeeded. Then a miracle happened. A certain fellow appeared by the name of Fritz Platten, who said, "We'll fix it all." He went into the German consulate in Switzerland, which had previously denied Lenin passage, and he sorted it all out with them. Then he said, "Vladimir Ilyich, go ahead and submit your application." Lenin was obviously sceptical, since he had already been denied two weeks earlier. He went in, was met by the German ambassador, and handed over his document on which was written: "Conditions under which Russian revolutionary emigrees will agree to transit through the territory of Germany." Notice he didn't say 'permit me'. He said "We are willing to transit under these conditions" -- namely exterritoriality [ie not subject to state laws], no luggage inspection and so on. The German ambassador takes it and says: "Are you mad?" Meaning: look, you're the one requesting permission to transit through Germany, it's not Germany requesting permission for transit through Russia! It's not your place to demand, but to request. Lenin told him: "Look, sir, go and ask Berlin." The Ambassador wrote a telegram which was basically saying: some annoying Russian revolutionaries have come in, and moreover are laying out their demands for transit. What should we do with them? He was thinking the answer would again be "Decline." But what came back was "Accepted their conditions." Astonished, with all of Lenin's conditions having been accepted, the Germans prepared the train, with troops in the vestibule, exterritoriality, no inspections of anything, and off they went. Returning to the current reality: people came to make a request, but now they are making demands. What has happened? There is a narrative that the Europeans orchestrated war, destroyed nations, and of course that is true. But really, that has nothing to do with granting political asylum. You can't just walk into the offices of a state agency to seek asylum and start pushing your rights: "Well, you destroyed my country, so you owe me." They will cart you off back to where you came from, right? The system was very simple, although the procedure is lengthy and bureaucratic. After someone submits an application, they have the right to live in that territory, they get some allowance, and are a little bit integrated into Western society. Later, after assessment, some are allowed to stay, while others get deported. So the system was working like that for a long time, and, now, suddenly demands are being made. What does this mean? Someone from above has pressured the authorities in the EU, just as happened to the German ambassador in Switzerland in 1917: "You know what, forget about everything, forget the procedures, let them go wherever they want, demand whatever they want, and so on." So someone has organised this and it's not the EU. So let's consider who could have organised it. Put aside ISIS and al-Qaeda, as they only exist in the media world, and in the form of armed groups receiving money, weapons and instructions from MI6, and train Bedouins to wield a weapon and cut people's heads off. What's left? Some serious power, which is forcing the European states to forget their own rules. Who has organised this? The United States of America. Notice, a plan was published for the distribution of the refugees in Europe, and the UK got zero. Everyone was accommodating the, but not UK. And the US is another UK, but very far away. No-one could ever get there by sea, because that would require an ocean liner and not some crumbling rust-bucket. However, to get into the UK, you just need to walk thrugh the Channel Tunnel, so no-one is crossing by sea. But they are not affected by the refugee problem. The whole region has been ravaged. Obviously, the migrant waves will be directed towards where there is prosperity. Notice where all these people are going -- no-one is going to Saudi Arabia, or to Qatar, or Bahrain, which are closer and people of the same faith. Among the refugees are many Arabs, but also non-Arabs. The Arabs are essentially one ethnicity, but they don't go to those countries, only to Europe. Which means it's an organised process. Next question. We are told that the refugees pay money to the people-smugglers. That's probably true. Question: where do they get the money from? That's probably true. Question: where do they get the money from? These people are obviously not the poorest. If they fled with only the shirt on their back, after their home was shelled, then the smugglers will not take them to Europe. So these are not the most disadvantaged people. Or if they are, then someone has given them money for the journey. Interviewer: The smugglers wouldn't take them for free. Nikolai Starikov: Right -- it's not some humanitarian smugglers transporting them. It means that somebody gave them the money. Next. There is a huge number of men of military age, with expensive telephones, withdrawing cash with ATM cards. My friends from Hungary called me and reported that it seems to be their daily allowance. We are being told that they are militants. I was amused that someone reported the figure of 4,000 fighters -- then all the mass media repeated it. Question: how do they know the number? Did they check the box, "I am an ISIS militant" when filling out the form? OK, a photo was found of one person with a scar, and published on Twitter. It was clearly the same person. But how do they know there are 4,000 fighters? Only whoever counted them could know that, which no-one could do among hundreds of thousands of refugees, unless they themselves confessed. Next question. You are ISIS and you're conducting heavy military operations against the Kurdish militia, the Iraqi Army, Bashar al-Assad and the Syrian Army. How many men do you have? Twenty thousand? And at this point you dispatched 4,000 to Europe. Why? In order to establish terrorist centres in Europe. Before that, you only needed 10 people. Have there been terrorist atrocities in Europe? Yes. Had they sent thousands of terrorists to Europe? Tens of thousands? Of course not. They are individuals. You would sent 5-6 people, a group, a cell, a reconnaissance network. You wouldn't send a thousand intelligence agents. It means that entire divisions have been removed from the front and sent to Europe under the guise of refugees. For what? Later, relatives can easily join them, if they become integrated. Again it's a strange kind of situation. Next, these refugees are very well organised. In Budapest the soccer fans, who are always a bit afflicted by a nationalist view of life, started throwing things at them, and they started throwing back. Imagine: people are dispirited, women, children, pensioners. Stones are thrown at them, and they start throwing stones back. It's very well organised. So there are tons of questions. Clearly, this has been organised. Clearly, money has been allocated for this. Clearly, Europe has thrown its hands up in the air for some reason, and is doing nothing. Two hundred thousand people have been brought to Germany in one week, but they say, "OK, fine, we'll put 6 billion into the budget, that's trivial." And what of the voters' voices? You know how the neo-liberals like to say: that money could have been spent on kindergartens, roads and pensions. Where is all of that? There is none of that. Next. Another interesting consideration on this subject. Whenever we see a large number of people migrating in an organised fashion, we know that someone is carefully directing this process. And look at the accompanying media attention. Have people died during the Mediterranean sea crossings? It is always said that this is inevitable: shipwrecks will always happen. At just the right time, the photo of the Syrian boy was found. It has been seen, how the shameless journalists who had found him repositioned him and then photographed him. What ws the conclusion from that? Since a Syrian boy has drowned, let's take revenge on Bashar al-Assad. In an opinion poll, 52% of Brits support air-strikes on Syrian troops by the UK airforce. Look at the logic -- it is completely absent, because the media veil closes people's eyes. Think about this: the West supports the rebels in Syria, Iraq, Libya. Out of these rebels they assemble ISIS, which didn't exist before -- how did it appear? ISIS starts fighting a war. People start fleeing from this ISIS -- not from the government forces. Some perished while fleeing. To take revenge for those people, let's bomb the Syrian army, which is opposing ISIS. This is some utterly alternative reality that's being created. Interviewer: They exploit whatever they can. Nikolai Starikov: So what's the result? The US deals a blow to Europe -- as I wrote in my book, "Chaos and Revolution as the Dollar's Weapons" -- but only such as to weaken it, to keep it subordinated, and not to collapse it, because it is needed as an ally against Russia and China. When Libya was Destroyed, it was obvious there would be a big migration wave. Dealing with it is very easy. I'll give some free advice to our European partners on how this is done. Remember that anyone crossing to Europe is supposedly spending money, right? Well, if they have crossed to Lampedusa, then wash and feed the, let them sleep, then put them on a big white steamship and take them back to Africa. Question: will they try and cross a second time? Interviewer: Hardly. Nikolai Starikov: OK, suppose they do. Then they get washed and fed, given a place to sleep, and in the morning they're back on the steamship to Africa. Will they turn up a third time? Interviewer: Maybe they will. Nikolai Starikov: Even if someone keeps giving them money for this travel, they'll get bored anyway. You'll get sick -- you crossed the sea, had a look. What did you see? Your room. Then crossed back. It's boring. Even for tourism they wouldn't keep crossing, never mind migration. If they want these people to stop sailing across to you, then just return them, and that's all. Everyone will learn of it. In that sea-port they will say: "My dear friend, we will happily take you to Lampedusa, but you will be back here again tomorrow. You really need that?" So the issue of these refugees is very simple to solve. Moreover it's within the framework of the law: deportation of people not having the right to political asylum. You could have an expedited procedure, if you find yourself choking, NOT HALF A YEAR, but one day. Maybe for every one person who really has valid circumstances and is allowed to stay, another hundred are sent back. And that's it -- the issue is resolved. This is a crisis, they're building walls, people are travelling on foot. I'm speechless. And the last point I want to make on this: people in Ukraine wanted to get into Europe. No-one is going to remove the visa requirements. However, an example has now been shown. Evidently, there are no borders any more -- the customs and border rules have been removed. Since it's possible for Arabs and blacks, why not for Ukrainians? They just need to assemble in a crowed of 100,000 people and simply walk across the Polish border -- calmly, peacefully, shouting as they go. The Polish border guards shall, according to the rules of this type of migrant, move aside, take down the barbed wire, and tie up their dogs. Then this crowd shall proceed -- on foot or on transport, however it turns out -- to Warsaw, seize the train station, and demand to be taken to Berlin. And they should be taken. Otherwise, what kind of discrimination is this? Why do you transport Syrians, but you won't take Ukrainians from Warsaw to Berlin? Interviewer: Those who so desperately wanted to get into Europe. Nikolai Starikov: At the very least they say they are culturally the same peole, although you and i know that these are people of Russian civilisation. Their skin colour is similar to Europeans, but their mindset is completely differenet. But that's not the point here. Does anyone really think this will happen? Interviewer: Let them give it a try. Nikolai Starikov: It's not going to happen -- I can tell you right away. The Poles will release the dogs, use gas. They won't let anyone through. So we have a strange situation: in Poland the state system is operating as it's supposed to, while the rest of Europe it's been suspended for some reason. Why? Because currently there is a need to bring people from one place and not from the other. That's the whole story. Interviewer: What is achieved by weakening Europe? Whay are they being put down like this? Nikolai Starikov: The Americans, and the Anglo-Saxons in general, as part of their strategy, always stick to the same principle: their allies must be weaker than them. That's why they were always trying to weaken the Soviet Union during WWII. They didn't open a second front, forgot to hand over navy ships. When Italy pulled out fo the war, their navy fell to the English. Obviously, it was suppoed to be split into three equal parts, but they forgot about all that. Comrade Stalin said at every conference: "Guys, where is our share of the Italian Navy?" In the end, he insisted. The English with their ships and subs handed over part of the Italian Navy. Only after the war did we get the former Giulio Cesare, which later became, if I remember correctly, the Novorossiysk, and sadly was blown up by a frogman, and destroyed. So their allies have to be weaker than them. Once Europe became strong and Germany began to do its own thing, they planned such an attack. Notice that the waves of refugees, which have now turned up in Europe, are heading for only one country. Interviewer: Germany. Nikolai Starikov: Germany. Let's ask ourselves a question. In Syria, Libya and elsewhere, in all the magazines, TV and radio stations, have they been talking about only one country? So everyone is unaware that there is Austria with a high standard of living, France is alright too; then there is Luxembourg, Belgium, Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy and every kind of country -- do they not know that? There's even Greece, too. But they know only Germany. What's this nonsense?! Why are they all going only to Germany? Why not stay in Austria? Their standard of living is more or less the same. They are all going to Germany. Now see, at almost the same moment, just last week, Gazprom signed an agreement with German companies to begin the construction of the second branch of the Nord Stream gas pipeline. Where does it deliver gas to? Interviewer: Germany. Nikolai Starikov: Germany. Where are all the refugees are going? Following the gas. It's a remarkable coincidence, isn't it? Interviewer: Gas is not the only reason. Nikolai Starikov: But those who have organised the stream of refugees don't want the gas to reach Germany, giving Germany independence. But suppose they can't prevent construction of the second pipeline branch. Remember how they obstructed the first -- Estonia tried in every way, Sweden too. They said: "Your pipeline is environmentally incompatible with our Baltic sea-bed ... the seaweed will die off." Estonia banned construction within their territorial waters, so they had to make a 'hook', but the Swedish environmentalists got upset. So if you don't have those instruments, then do something different: "OK, guys, carry on building as you are. But meanwhile, we will construct our own 'south stream' -- not gas, but refugees. So consider the pros and cons" Methinks these two events are tightly correlated. Interviewer: So it means Europe is being held on a hook. On the one hand, they have to assist and obey the US, but on the other hand, they mustn't become so strong that they could afford to disobey. From the perspective of the Americans and the English, Europe should not have the right to a voice at all. Nikolai Starikov: They were told "bomb Libya," even if it means you wil get refugees later. They were told "support the war in Ukraine," so they had to support it, even though trade routes will be broken and you will have armed conflicts in your soft underbelly. As one conscientious blogger here said (Navalny): "expand, don't reflect." Same here -- don't think about what Washington is telling you, just do it, and it will be fine. But Europeans are not really happy with this situation, as they are the ones footing the bill for this party. That's why they're infuriated. And they're being put in their place. [Subtitles by New Insight] COMMENT Always knew this was organised bullsh*t. ---------------------------------------- Europa-Evropa |
1900: Europe had QUARTER of world population.
1900: Europe had 3 times population of Africa.
2050: Europe forecast: 7 per cent of world population.
2050: Europe forecast: one-third population of Africa.
Decades: Indigenous European population displacement by non-Europeans.
 Europeans are endangered.
|
Tuesday, 9 February 2016
Manufactured 'Refugee Crisis' - Invasion of Europe - US-Anglo Strategy to Weaken Ally Europe
Invaders as Welcome as Ebola - Germans Are Afraid
| ---------------------------------------- ARTICLE ----------------------------------------
---------------------------------------- COMMENT
No way known is Germany a sovereign state.
Germany remains an American post-WWII puppet-state, through which American interests are destroying the rest of Europe.
This isn't just a war on Germans, it's a war on all Europeans wherever they may be: look at the demographics.
---------------------------------------- Europa-Evropa |
Europe Turns to Shit, As Genocidal Government & Media Lie
| ---------------------------------------- ARTICLE ----------------------------------------
Europe Turns to Shit, As Genocidal Government & Media Lie
INVADER SAVAGERY / discuss robbing, raping & taking Europeans hostage / use random children as shields / defecated where they stood / 90% able-bodied healthy men 18-45 years / trampling food / shouting 'money' / grabbing at passers-by, trying to take luggage & valuables / aside from hatred & absolute ill-will, they have nothing to offer Europeans ---------------------------------------- COMMENT What the genocidal government and lying corporate media won't tell you. ---------------------------------------- Europa-Evropa |
Britain: NHS About to Collapse Under Brussels Rules EU Health Tourists
| ---------------------------------------- ARTICLE ---------------------------------------- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3438040/Top-cancer-doctor-warns-health-tourist-migrants-bleeding-hospitals-dry-demand-treatment-leaving-NHS-breaking-point.html 'Migrants are pushing NHS to breaking point': Top cancer doctor warns health tourists are bleeding hospitals dry with demand for treatment By James Slack, Political Editor For The Daily Mail Published: 10:54 EST, 9 February 2016 | Updated: 11:43 EST, 9 February 2016
The NHS has been left 'on its knees' by uncontrolled migration from the EU, a leading cancer expert will warn tomorrow.
Professor Angus Dalgleish, the principal of the Cancer Vaccine Institute, says the NHS is being bled dry of resources by health tourists denied care at home. Cancer treatment can cost £200,000 and, under Brussels rules, Britain has to offer it to all EU nationals. Professor Dalgleish says this partly explains the NHS's £3billion deficit. He will also claim the Government has hindered progress into key disease areas 'by blindly adhering to EU directives'. 'Our membership of the EU is putting an intolerable strain on our NHS,' Professor Dalgleish, a melanoma expert of global renown, will tell a conference. 'The NHS is on its knees and could collapse completely. NHS Trusts were not prepared for the millions of EU migrants who have poured into Britain because the Government estimate was nowhere near the reality. 'GP services are collapsing under the huge number of people they are having to treat and this has led to less than 20 per cent of students wanting to become GPs. 'Britain is attracting thousands of health tourists from across the EU who cannot get certain drugs or treatments in their home country so come to Britain and demand them as EU citizens. 'Cancer treatment can cost £200,000 a year per patient and while we remain in the EU, Britain has to offer treatment for any EU citizen who comes here so as to not discriminate. The Health Service is being bled dry – this is why our NHS faces a £3 billion deficit.' Professor Dalgleish, a fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, also claims that EU rules and regulations are holding back cancer trials which could discover new cures or treatments. He will say: 'The introduction of the EU clinical trials directive meant academic led studies carried out in Britain became illegal if not performed to new EU standards. By blindly adhering to EU directives, the British Government has hindered crucial medical research in key disease areas. 'The unfathomable amount of EU regulation and bureaucracy has led to a third less clinical studies taking place in Britain. 'Britain was world leading in these studies but because of the EU, we now lag behind the United States.' Professor Dalgleish is also expected to make a withering attack on the EU working time directive – which the Prime Minister opted not to challenge in his referendum negotiations with Brussels. He will say: 'This has destroyed the ability of the NHS to deliver service and training. 'Training has been hit so hard that standards have slipped to worrying levels. Surgeons are not gaining the same experience a registrar previously had when appointed to consultant positions. 'Other EU countries were creative in incorporating the working time directive to ensure specialists could get the 60 hours a week experience needed but the British Government adopted the directive without thinking through the ramifications. 'As a result, training has been hit so hard that standards have dropped and patient care has suffered.' Professor Dalgleish is due to deliver his speech at a conference titled The Good Life After Brexit, which has a theme that Britain will be safer leaving the EU. He will share a platform with former Tory ministers Liam Fox, David Davis and John Redwood, Labour MP Graham Stringer, Ukip leader Nigel Farage and the DUP's Ian Paisley Jr. The conference has been organised by David Campbell Bannerman MEP, co-chairman of Conservatives For Britain. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3438040/Top-cancer-doctor-warns-health-tourist-migrants-bleeding-hospitals-dry-demand-treatment-leaving-NHS-breaking-point.html ---------------------------------------- COMMENT
Britain's an insane asylum run by lunatics, aiming to kill off the native British.
---------------------------------------- Europa-Evropa |
Australia, Bendigo - Sudanese & Afghani Rapefugees
| ---------------------------------------- ARTICLE ---------------------------------------- http://cairnsnews.org/2015/10/16/australia-police-told-to-cover-up-muslim-identity-behind-14-x-brutal-gang-rape-of-young-bendigo-mother/ Australia: Police told to cover up Muslim identity behind 14 x brutal gang rape of young Bendigo mother Oct 16, 2015 Posted by cairnsnews https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2015/08/15/australia-police-told-to-cover-up-muslim-identity-behind-14-time-brutal-gang-rape-of-young-mother/ BENDIGO’S GANG RAPISTS EXPOSED
No, this is not about the Bendigo Bank’s rapacious associates who have a financial interest in the land surrounding the proposed mega mosque. Nor is it about how the Bendigo Bank cancelled the accounts of all those who objected to the rape of their city. Nor is it about the corrupted Bendigo councillors who did not declare an interest.
And it’s not even about the Bendigo Bank’s violation of community sentiments in promoting the crass Islamification of one of Australia’s historic and iconic cities. No, but do you recall that ghastly gang rape of a young Bendigo mother… a case that had completely disappeared under a media blackout? Well, a whistleblower has disclosed the filthy tactics employed by Bendigo’s newly empowered Muslims: “I was working for the DPP’s department of human services at the time and was directly involved in this case. I am reluctant to openly disclose this type of information as former colleagues have faced legal action for far less.” The anonymous whistleblower went on to say, “Actually, they were all African Muslims and there were more than six involved in the savage rape but only six were formally charged. No adults were convicted. “It was common knowledge at the time that the adult offenders conspired, under legal advice, to blame the younger offenders for the crime as juveniles would receive the more lenient sentences and a media blackout would be imposed on the entire case”, he said. As a result, details of the case have never surfaced and the adults involved, Mohammed Elnour, 19, Akoak Manon, 19, and Mohammed Zaoli, 22, walked away scot free after having raped the poor woman 14 times while her two children were present in her home. “All three juvenile rapists spent some time in remand, yet only two were sentenced and both served no more than 12 months. “Not one of the gang ever admitted guilt nor did they show any remorse for their actions. It was common knowledge that the offenders received financial assistance for their legal defence from the Muslim community, but only after it was confirmed the victim was a young non-Muslim Australian woman. “DHS and Vicpol members involved in the case were absolutely disgusted by all aspects of the crime itself and the way it was handled but we all were constantly reminded that we would face legal action if found to have disclosed information to the media. “One thing I would love to share with all Australians is the time when two of the offenders were visited by their family (a loving moderate Muslim family) for the first time since they had been in remand. “After the offenders had informed the family that it was, ‘All okay because the victim was just an Aussie girl’, the entire family stood and hugged the offenders in relief, the mother was crying tears of joy as she knew the family would have been shunned by the Muslim community if the victim had been a Muslim girl. “I hope you see fit to share this information with the Australian people and continue the great work.” Bendigo’s past will hold a proud place in the hearts of Australians. Its future will hold nothing but contempt http://cairnsnews.org/2015/10/16/australia-police-told-to-cover-up-muslim-identity-behind-14-x-brutal-gang-rape-of-young-bendigo-mother/ ---------------------------------------- ARTICLE ---------------------------------------- http://www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/story/75614/police-say-bendigo-mother-raped-14-times/ Police say Bendigo mother raped 14 times By ELISE SNASHALL-WOODHAMS April 3, 2012, 12:03 p.m. Mohammed Elnour, 19 -- 17 charges, including 14 counts of rape -- single counts of indecent assault, unlawful assault and false imprisonment -- using a carriage service to harass and harassing a witness Akoak Manon, 19 -- 17 charges, including 14 counts of rape -- single counts of indecent assault, unlawful assault and false imprisonment Mohammed Zaoli, 22 -- 17 charges, including 14 counts of rape -- single counts of indecent assault, unlawful assault and false imprisonment 14 separate charges of digital and penile rape committed by perpetrators charge of false imprisonment came when the complainant was dragged from the kitchen woman was allegedly raped a further 10 times in the laundry http://www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/story/75614/police-say-bendigo-mother-raped-14-times/ Other: "Each of the men, who came to Australia as refugees from Sudan and Afghanistan, have been charged with 17 offences, including rape and assault." http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=97c_1295064591 ---------------------------------------- COMMENT Anyone else see a pattern here? ---------------------------------------- Europa-Evropa |
Gang Rape & Murder of Hindu Girl: Shipra Ghosh (20), Student, 2013
| ---------------------------------------- ARTICLE ---------------------------------------- West India  Bengal’s Kamduni gang-rape case: 3 convicts get death sentence, 3 others get life imprisonment http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/kolkata/Bengals-Kamduni-gang-rape-case-3-convicts-get-death-sentence-3-others-get-life-imprisonment/articleshow/50785762.cms ---------------------------------------- COMMENT
While this relates to gang-rape & a horrific murder of a Hindu girl in West India, it is also relevant in a wider sense, due to the large-scale, ongoing population transfer that both Europe and European-settled Western countries have seen to date.
---------------------------------------- Europa-Evropa |
Britain - Gang Rape - Female Minor - 12 South Asians (ie Pakistan, Afghanistan Extraction)
| ---------------------------------------- ARTICLE ---------------------------------------- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3437252/Twelve-men-repeatedly-gang-raped-abused-vulnerable-teenage-schoolgirl-saw-utterly-worthless-jailed-total-140-YEARS.html Twelve men who repeatedly gang-raped and abused white schoolgirl they saw as 'utterly worthless' are jailed for 140 YEARS - but alleged ringleader 'remains on the run after fleeing to Bangladesh' By James Dunn For Mailonline Published: 01:29 EST, 9 February 2016 | Updated: 02:29 EST, 9 February 2016
EXTRACT
An arrogant gang of 12 men have been jailed for a total of 140 years for the repeated rape and sexual abuse of a vulnerable schoolgirl they saw as 'utterly worthless'.
Eleven were jailed for rape and a twelfth man was jailed for sexual activity with a child under 16 today at Bradford Crown Court. Their white British victim was aged 13 and 14 when she was repeatedly raped and sexually abused and passed around by the men, all of south Asian descent, over a period of 13 months between 2011 and --- Khalid Mahood, 34, was given an extended sentence of 17 years comprising a custodial term of 13 and a half years and an extended licence of three and a half years. Sufyan Ziarab, 22, from Keighley, West Yorkshire, was jailed for 15 years. His brother Bilal Ziarab, 21, from Bradford, West Yorkshire, was jailed for 12 years. Bilal Ziarab previous conviction for sexual activity with a child. Yasser Kabir, 25, from Keighley was jailed for 15 years with a consecutive five years after being found guilty in June 2015 for offences on two girls aged between five and nine when he was between 13 and 15. Hussain Sardar, 19, from Keighley received six years detention in a young offenders institution. Nasir Khan, 22, from Keighley, was jailed for 13 years. Nazir Khan had a conviction for exposure. His brother Faisal Khan, 27, from Keighley was jailed for 13 years. Saqib Younis, 29, from Keighley was jailed for 13 years. Israr Ali, 19, from Keighley, received three and a half years detention in a young offenders institute. Zain Ali, 20, from Keighley, received eight years in a young defenders institute. Tanqueer Hussain, 23, from Keighley was jailed for 13 years and received a five year consecutive sentence for the rape of a second underage victim in 2009. Mohammed Akram, 63, was jailed for five years. Only Tauqeer Hussain and Mohammed Akram were of previous good character. EXTRACT - FULL AT SOURCE http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3437252/Twelve-men-repeatedly-gang-raped-abused-vulnerable-teenage-schoolgirl-saw-utterly-worthless-jailed-total-140-YEARS.html ---------------------------------------- COMMENT The politicians that facilitated the invasion of Britain, along with the child rape, ought to be in prison with them. ---------------------------------------- Europa-Evropa |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)