1900: Europe had QUARTER of world population.
1900: Europe had 3 times population of Africa.
2050: Europe forecast: 7 per cent of world population.
2050: Europe forecast: one-third population of Africa.
Decades: Indigenous European population displacement by non-Europeans.

Europeans are endangered.

Tuesday, 16 February 2016

Germany, Hannover - Female Student (25) - Rape & Violent Assault - Algerian Suspect

----------------------------------------
ARTICLE
----------------------------------------
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3440601/Algerian-sex-attacker-shouted-Inshallah-Allah-wills-raped-25-year-old-German-student-asked-enjoyed-it.html

'Algerian sex attacker shouted "Inshallah" - if Allah wills it - as he raped a 25-year-old German student - then asked her if she had enjoyed it'

Published: 09:30 EST, 10 February 2016 | Updated: 10:12 EST, 10 February 2016


An Algerian man who almost killed his 25-year-old student victim shouted out 'if Allah wills it' in Arabic as he raped her in a darkened alley, a court has heard.

The man, identified only by his first name Rheda, is accused of following the student as she walked home from a nightclub at 5am in Hannover, Germany.

Afterwards, with his victim badly beaten, he is alleged to have climbed off her and asked her if she enjoyed it.

The shocking details were revealed at the trial of the 37-year-old asylum seeker from Algeria who has denied rape. Prosecutors say DNA evidence links him to the crime.

The young woman, identified only by her first name Lara, said it was the worst moment of her life when she was attacked.

She said: 'He asked me in broken German if I had [the] time. Before I could reply he then grabbed me by the arm and pulled me down an alleyway.

'He told me "I need sex". I opened my mouth to scream but he put his hand over my mouth. I had a pepper spray, and I tried to spray it at him but he grabbed it off me, and used it on me instead.
'Then he threw me onto the ground, and tried to pull off my trousers but he couldn't do it. Then he started screaming at me to get undressed.'

She told the court she had tried to win time by begging him to leave her alone and hoped that someone would come past.

Nobody did, and when she tried to scream again he started beating her in the face and he sprayed the pepper spray on her face again.

He had banged her head on the ground repeatedly until she was almost unconscious, and she thought she was going to die.

She said: 'He put his hand over my mouth and closed my nose, and I thought I was going to suffocate. I then indicated to him that I had given in, and would do what he wanted if he let me breathe.'

He then raped her and she said that throughout he was talking to himself, shouting 'Inshallah' - which is Arabic for 'if Allah wills it'.

She said: 'Afterwards he asked me if it was good, and if I had enjoyed it.'

Her voice then broke as she added: 'I never would have thought something like that could happen to me. I just couldn't comprehend it. I thought I was going to die.'

She identified her alleged attacker in court. He denies rape.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3440601/Algerian-sex-attacker-shouted-Inshallah-Allah-wills-raped-25-year-old-German-student-asked-enjoyed-it.html

----------------------------------------
COMMENT

The problem with weapons and self-defence tactics for women in these situations is that women are often no match for their attackers.  Yes, sometimes they get lucky and manage to fend off an attacker, but I think that might be the exception rather than the norm.

I'm going to guess that girls and women will be forced to radically change their lifestyles in Europe (and in any other high risk of rape/assault regions), in an effort to avoid rape, robbery or assault.

After reading all these articles on European rapes and assaults, I'm freaked out enough to feel sick in my stomach thinking about the dangers unwitting and helpless women (and children) have been exposed to by their own governments.

Far removed, familiar, and once 'safe'-seeming surroundings don't feel all that safe anymore ... even in broad daylight.

Not sure that I'd be game to take the long (daylight) walks I used to take in parks, reserves, and on secluded walk-tracks etc.  I'd definitely be too chicken to take the occasional night-time walk around the block these days.

Although I've never been a fan of public transport or of public spaces, those spaces are so much less appealing now.



----------------------------------------
Europa-Evropa

England, Crewe - Slovakian Roma Gypsy Attack - William Stanier School

----------------------------------------
ARTICLE
----------------------------------------
http://whitegenocideproject.com/gypsies-threaten-to-rape-english-schoolgirls-they-demand-to-be-bowed-down-to/

"They reported it on the mirror. If someone ever read it, then you’ll notice that they are hiding the racial origin of these attacks, in fact they only mention “roma” just one time, when mentioning the racial makeup of the school’s area (mostly gypsies slavic), and instead refer “slovakians” to the roma (gypsies) pupils who attacked the english ones."

Slovakian Gypsies threaten to rape English schoolgirls, they demand to be bowed down to


by Steve Goode • February 13, 2016 • 13 Comments


English men have been patrolling the streets of Crewe, a town in Northern England, after “Roma” (Gypsy) immigrant children from Slovakia started a wave of attacks and threats.
Trouble started brewing at William Stanier school in the beginning of February.

Catherine Hollinshead, a parent, recalled that “girls were being dragged around by their hair, two girls had hair ripped out. Other children were thrown down three flights of stairs, one of whom suffered a broken arm. A teacher was head-butted.”

“The Slovakian [Roma / Gypsy] boys threatened to rape the girls. Threats were put on the girls toilet wall saying ‘English will die’.”

Police were called to intervene in a lunchtime fight between pupils, but both the police and the school headmaster (principal), Jason Fraser, have tried to downplay the violence.

A petition claims that “The Headmaster, Mr Fraser and various other authorities have tried to hide the truth of what actually happened.”

Darren Powell, who has daughters at the school, said that the Gypsy pupils were “standing on tables and giving orders for English children to bow down as they run the school and that English girls will be raped by them…”

He said that this provoked English children, and fighting broke out.

“One girl was assaulted so badly she looked like she had been scalped others thrown down stairs beaten up while hundreds panicked and were running for safety.”

Slovakian [Roma / Gypsy]  children had weapons that would cause severe injury while teachers locked themselves with some students in classrooms while one teacher was head butted another pregnant teacher feared for her and unborn.”

“I kept my daughters off as they were scared to return as they were threatened with assault and rape.”

Sonia Ralphs, the mother of a student said: “It is not fair to put my son or other kids in danger and lying about it. I’m not happy at all as the Slovak [Roma / Gypsy] kids parents’ were climbing over and our kids were outside it’s disgusting and they were saying you English kids bow down to us.”
 

----------------------------------------
COMMENT

NOTE:

1.  the media cover-up by The Mirror and attribution of attack to European nationals (Slovakians) rather than the non-European minority responsible.

2.  alleged downplaying of attack by educational authorities.


----------------------------------------
Europa-Evropa

Australia - Mark Steyn - S.18c Racial Discrimination Act - Freedom of Speech - Border Control - 'Diversity' & Civilisational Death Wish

----------------------------------------
ARTICLE
----------------------------------------


http://www.lukeford.net/blog/?p=87858

Europe’s open doors are a civilisation death wish

Posted on February 14, 2016 by Luke Ford   

The Australian: Australians should feel unashamed about our immigration policies and instead fight the growth of identity politics and the undermining of free speech.
That’s the message of provoc­ative Canadian commentator Mark Steyn, who tomorrow begins an Australian speaking tour sponsored by the Institute of Public ­Affairs.

Free speech is at the heart of Steyn’s message. He is surprised that the controversial section 18c of our Racial Discrimination Act is still standing when his own country successfully repealed the equivalent parts of its Human Rights Act in 2013.

“Free peoples are losing the habit of free speech,” he says. “They’re taught, not really just at university but in fact from kindergarten, that there is a correct view of certain subjects and that incorrect views are distressing. The last two generations raised in the Western world, they don’t do that thing, the apocryphal Voltaire line, ‘I disagree with what you say but I’ll fight to the death for you to.’ They’ll fight to the death for you not to be allowed to say it.”

The consequences can be disturbing. “People can actually lose the spirit of liberty and once you’ve lost that there are not a lot of easy paths back,” he cautions.

Steyn says the initial reluctance of politicians and much of the media to acknowledge, let alone discuss frankly, events in ­Cologne on New Year’s Eve or the growing problem of sexual assault in Sweden did nothing to preserve social cohesion but instead widened a democratic deficit between governments and the governed over the tide of asylum-seekers sweeping across Europe.

“Free speech is like being a little bit pregnant,” he says. “You can’t be a little bit free speech.”

He talks of meeting people fleeing the Balkans as a journalist covering the wars that accompanied the disintegration of Yugoslavia. “In Europe the whole migrant thing is basically open mockery of the whole idea of refugees,” he says.

Steyn says EU leaders need to speak frankly about the forces now pulling people to the continent and how they are different.

He points to Africa. “People now have cell phones,” Steyn says. They can see what’s going on in the world. Even as recently as the 1980s their glimpse of life in the West came from re-runs of Dallas.

“It’s a different world now. They can see in real time their cousin who got on a boat from Libya and wound up in Italy and walked over to Sweden. They’re seeing in real time the kind of life their cousin is living. What percentage of North Africa has to decide ‘We’d quite like to move to Europe’ for there to be no ­Europe?”

As a result, Steyn sees nothing wrong with Australia’s asylum-seeker policies. “Australia does what every country used to do until the 1960s. It reserves the right to pick and choose who it admits to within its borders.” He adds: “In effect, everyone in Australia is Donald Trump.”

But Steyn points to the different recent experiences of asylum-seeker flows of Europe and Australia. “Europe is basically as near to Africa as Australia is to ­Indonesia,” he says, describing the EU’s approach as “the equivalent of Australia telling everyone in ­Indonesia, ‘See you in Darwin on Tuesday’.”

Steyn is blunt on the potential consequences of the uncontrolled flows of people. “If you lose control of your border you don’t have a country,” he says. In this environment, he is particularly concerned about the impact of identity politics and ­diversity policies that play on differences. He points to his experiences in the Balkans. “Once people start to think of tribal identities, you end up with tribal politics,” he warns. “It doesn’t matter if the tribe is Bosnians or Croats or whether its transgender and lesbians versus straight white males.”

Steyn jokes about “the Stanley Gibbons stamp collection approach to diversity” but says it is a trap that can cause ­divisions in wealthy, comfortable and largely homogenous societies, be they in Europe or our own.

“I raise my kids in New Hampshire which is 99.99999 per cent white,” he says. “I think there’s rumoured to be three black guys somewhere in the southern part of the state and two Hispanics. That’s it for New Hampshire.

“It gets kind of boring and people think wouldn’t it be nice to have bit of this and a bit of that. We live here and we’ve got all these people called Smith and Jones and all the rest of it. It would be much more interesting if we can have a bit more diversity. So look. There’s that nice gay couple who have moved into No 28 Victoria Gardens. And — ooh, aren’t we lucky now? There’s a nice fire-breathing imam who has moved into No 30.

“They can all meet. The fire-breathing imam can make conversation with the nice gay couple over the garden fence as they do on a Sunday afternoon.”

Then the joking ends. “The situation they’re now realising in Europe is that when you’re so boundlessly tolerant that you tolerate the avowedly intolerant then you basically have turned that whole kind of Stanley Gibbons diversity thing into a civilisational death wish,” Steyn says.

He warns against embracing the self-loathing that comes with the increasingly common use of concepts such as privilege and entitlement to delineate societal goodies and baddies — witting or not. “The minute you start using these things like privilege, what you’re doing is incentivising the most reductive kind of identity group politics,” Steyn says.

Here, he specifically references 18c and “what groups you can claim to be a member of” so before the law “what matters is not that you are a citizen like any other” but which “groups you have a purchase on”.

http://www.lukeford.net/blog/?p=87858

----------------------------------------
COMMENT

Australia’s off-shore detention asylum-seeker policies might be disapproved of by the suicidal liberal-left, by the corporate press, by the universal 'human rights' industry and its intelligentsia, but the fact is that Australia's borders are as open to non-European mass immigration as those of all other post-colonial Western nations, irrespective of consequences to the common man, who is without the buffer of wealth and privilege, or even the comforts of middle class advantage (eg expensive suburbs, private schools, private transport etc) that lends to being removed from from effects of 'multiculturalism.'  And it's the situation of the common man that is most impacted.  Material and other supports in the community (health, education & other facilities, welfare benefits, assisted housing, mental health services, old aged care services etc), as resources are diverted to immigrants.  As in, there is competition for scarce public resources for those that MOST NEED those resources in Western communities.

Over 25% of Australia's 24-million population is foreign born. That figure's staggering and, in terms of security, quite frightening.

The 'buffer' option works well for the wealthy, even as society eventually implodes, as the wealthy can always live behind walled estates and in suburbs that are protected by armed guard.

It's the poor that will be stuck in crime-ridden slums of the future.



----------------------------------------
Europa-Evropa

Germany, Hamburg - Lohmühle, Hamburg-Eißendorf: 24-year-old father attacked & stabbed / 3-mth-old baby daughter in sling subsequently dies - immersion in pond

----------------------------------------
ARTICLE
----------------------------------------

http://archive.is/0tPjg

Died baby after two weeks: Drama on a frozen pond

Tuesday, 02/09/2016 - 13:53

For two weeks, doctors in Hamburg fought for the life of a three month old girl, but on Monday night the baby died in hospital. It had broken with his father on a frozen pond.

The 24-year old father was on January 25, from the pond Lohmühle in Hamburg-Eißendorf been rescued. He wore his little daughter in a sling. When police he stated that he had been attacked by two men and wounded with a knife. he had fallen through the ice on the run.

The baby was probably several minutes under water and could be revived by rescuers first. It suffered thereby a strong supercooling and floated the next two weeks in critical condition.

Exactly how it came to the accident, is still not fully elucidated. The 24-year-old had, according to police testified to have lost his glasses in the raid. That's why he did in the dark can not see exactly where he was going.

The search for the two robbers apparently without success. The two attackers are than about 30 years old, described with dark hair. You should have spoken a
foreign language.


lba / dpa
http://archive.is/0tPjg
----------------------------------------
COMMENT

This must be a horrific loss for the new mother. 


----------------------------------------
Europa-Evropa

Russia, Murmansk - 51 Groping Refugees Taught A Lesson

----------------------------------------
ARTICLE
----------------------------------------
http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/04/refugees-go-clubbing-in-russia-harass-girls-wake-up-in-hospital-the-next-morning/

Refugees Go Clubbing In Russia, Harass Girls, Wake Up In Hospital The Next Morning

Jacob Bojesson  |  Reporter   4:52 PM 02/04/2016


A group of 51 refugees were brutally assaulted outside a night club in Murmansk, Russia, after they groped and molested women at a night club Saturday.

The refugees had previously been ordered to leave Norway for “bad behavior” and tried their luck in Russia. What they didn’t realize when they went out clubbing in Murmansk is that Russians have less tolerance when it comes to sexual assault on local women than other European countries.

The refugees allegedly groped and harassed women in a similar manner as the assaults in Cologne on New Year’s Eve. A group of male Russian took them aside to “educate” them that “Cologne is 2,500 kilometers south of here.” 

The refugees tried to flee but were quickly captured by the Russians. They then took them out to the street and gave them a beating they will remember. Police arrived to break up the fight but locals report that they threw a few punches at the refugees before arresting 33 of them. Eighteen refugees were in such bad condition they had to be take to the hospital.

Police decided to let the beatings slide and didn’t file a report. The only thing they could confirm was that there was “a mass brawl involving refugees.”

http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/04/refugees-go-clubbing-in-russia-harass-girls-wake-up-in-hospital-the-next-morning/

----------------------------------------
COMMENT


It must be nice living in Russia.


----------------------------------------
Europa-Evropa

Academia - Religion - Politics: Wheaton College, Illinois, USA - Associate Professor of Political Science, Larycia Hawkins

----------------------------------------
ARTICLE
----------------------------------------

Wheaton College and Professor to ‘Part Ways’ After Her Remarks on Muslims

By CHRISTINE HAUSERFEB. 8, 2016


A college professor in Illinois who had been at risk of being fired for her remarks on Islam and Christianity has agreed to “part ways” with the institution.

Wheaton College, an evangelical Christian institution, and Larycia Hawkins, an associate professor of political science, said in a joint statement that “they have come together and found a mutual place of resolution and reconciliation.”

It continued, ”The college and Dr. Hawkins have reached a confidential agreement under which they will part ways.”

The statement released on Saturday gave no further details. But it appeared to be an attempt to close a controversial chapter that involved concerns about academic freedom and that saw the college defending itself against accusations that its actions were anti-Muslim.

The events started in December, when Dr. Hawkins, a tenured professor who began teaching there in 2007, posted comments about Islam and Christianity. Muslim communities at the time were the focus of a backlash after terrorist attacks in Paris.

“I stand in religious solidarity with Muslims because they, like me, a Christian, are people of the book,” she wrote on Facebook, in part, on Dec. 10. “And as Pope Francis stated last week, we worship the same God.”

Dr. Hawkins also donned a hijab to show solidarity with Muslims.

Less than a week later, Wheaton put Dr. Hawkins on administrative leave with pay over “significant questions regarding the theological implications” of her remarks, saying they seemed inconsistent with the college’s doctrine. The college’s actions set off widespread debate on social media, and hundreds of alumni said in a petition they would reconsider donating to the college.

[CONTINUES]
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/09/us/larycia-hawkins-wheaton-college.html

----------------------------------------
COMMENT

Found this article interesting from a sociological / political perspective.

Not really sure what to make of it overall.


----------------------------------------
Europa-Evropa

AUSTRIA, Vienna - Murder - Lauren Mann (25) - Abdou I. (24) Gambian, West Africa - Alleged Prior Rape Underaged Female Victim (Germany)

----------------------------------------
ARTICLE
----------------------------------------

TWO VICTIMS
1.  Germany - rape (victim - minor female)
2.  Austria - murder-rape  (victim - adult female, American)

Illegal immigrant is arrested over murder of American nanny in Austria after she took him in to stop him being deported - and is revealed to have raped underage girl

By Flemming Emil Hansen In Vienna, Austria, For Dailymail.com

Published: 18:47 GMT, 5 February 2016 | Updated: 22:13 GMT, 5 February 2016


An illegal immigrant has been arrested over the murder of an American nanny who had given him shelter at her Vienna apartment.

The 24-year-old Gambian had been wanted by police since the death of Lauren Mann, 25, from Grand Junction, Colorado last month.

He was arrested on Thursday in Bern, Switzerland, at an asylum center there after his mobile phone use was traced.

The location of the arrest suggests he was trying to use the immigration system to avoid being returned to his home country.

He was named by prosecutors in Austria only as Abdou I., under a legal convention that the surnames of alleged criminals are not released until they are convicted.

No mugshot was released by authorities in either country.

Austrian newspaper Krone also reported that he was already known to police, having raped an underage girl in Germany.

The case is likely to highlight concerns which are growing in Europe over sex-crime related to the wave of immigrants arriving in the continent - although Abdou I. is from West Africa rather than the Middle East, from where the vast majority are currently arriving.

Austrian authorities will now have to request his extradition from neighboring Switzerland.

Nina Bussek, spokeswoman for the Austrian State Prosecutor, told Daily Mail Online: 'A suspect has been arrested in Switzerland. We can't provide any further details at the moment.

Local reports in Austria suggested that the Gambian had failed in his attempt to stay in the country but had been taken in out of compassion by Mann to avoid him being deported.

EXTRACT -- FULL AT SOURCE
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3433995/Illegal-immigrant-arrested-murder-American-nanny-Austria-took-stop-deported-revealed-raped-underage-girl.html

----------------------------------------
COMMENT

Note:
  • non-disclosure of full name of suspect (Austria)
  • NO MUGSHOT RELEASED BY POLICE
  • prior rape of under-aged girl victim in Germany


----------------------------------------
Europa-Evropa

Austria, Vienna: 10 Year Old Male Raped - Alleged Perpetrator: Iraqi Refugee

----------------------------------------
ARTICLE
----------------------------------------

Google Translation

http://archive.is/qyP9A

Child raped in Vienna - Iraqis confessing

What the "crown" reported in December   , Has now been officially announced by the police: A ten year old boy is on December 2 last year in an indoor pool in Vienna- Meidling raped. He wore such massive injuries that he had to be treated in the Children's Hospital of the General Hospital. The alleged perpetrator, a refugee from Iraq, could still be arrested at the scene and confesses.

In his police interrogation put the man on 13 September on the Balkans Route had come to Austria, according to a fact Poizeibericht confession. He talked about "sexual emergency". He was "pursued desires. I had not had sex in four months" his, kept the criminalists the details of the suspect firmly literally.

"I made a huge mistake"

Recently he had wrong in Iraq with a woman, but not "always sick" was with his wife that since the birth of their daughter. In Austria, he "could not stand to have sex because I have a pronounced excess sexual energy" is to remove the interrogation log on. When asked the officials whether it was not banned in Iraq to have sex with ten year old boy, said the refugee: "Such a thing is forbidden in any country of the world." He knew that he was "a huge mistake" and "leave a huge scar at the boys" have.

Police did not initially publish case

The office is investigating the 20- Years of rape and serious sexual abuse of minors, authorities spokeswoman Nina Bussek confirmed Friday. It is located in U- Detention. The police were the case we have not officially gone "from victim protection reasons" to the public, such as Thomas Keiblinger, spokesman for the State Police said.

For sexual offenses will consider whether the circumstances of the case justify a publicizing. That you wanted to conceal the fact, in order not to heat up the mood of the population because of suspicious refugee was only a few weeks in the country, had "played a role in no case," assured Keiblinger. We've only recently reported on an asylum   , The Prater is a 18- Old had raped.

Year-olds in WC raped cabin

The year-olds had the Theresienbad far from the Meidlinger Hauptstraße visited where it just to run around in the swimming pool a 15- year-old boy met. In whose was accompanied by the 20- year Iraqi who - the particulars of the person concerned - the Ten Years' finally grabbed the hand, in a toilet Cabin urged, locked the door, the boy pulled down the trunks and went to him.

The boy cried out in pain, but was heard by anyone. After he had satisfied himself, leaving the 20- Perennial the toilet and amused himself with jumps from three meters board. The ten year old, who had suffered serious injuries in the anal region, eventually confided in tears to the lifeguard, who immediately informed the police. For the 20- Year-old who had been working in Iraq as a taxi driver and lived in Austria from the basic public services, yet clicked in swimwear handcuffs.
http://archive.is/qyP9A

----------------------------------------
COMMENT


Translation is a little awkward.  

Ten year old raped, allegedly by Iraqi asylum seeker perp who arrived via the Balkans route to Austria.

I'd say a 20 year old is being investigated (rather than  20 years investigated).

Police covered up information of this assault by an asylum seeker.

Not sure if a separate incident is being discussed later in the article, or if it's the one incident (and an exceedingly bad translation).




----------------------------------------
Europa-Evropa

Sweden - Knife Killing of 7 Year Old Female Victim - Eritrean Asylum Seeker

----------------------------------------
ARTICLE
----------------------------------------
Sweden: Welfare migrant cuts throat of host family’s 7-year-old daughter
January 6, 2016 , by Nicolai Sennels

    “A seven year old girl was stabbed to death in an apartment in Upplands-Bro in northern Stockholm on 25 July this year by a 36 year old man, Daniel Gebru. Ten months earlier Gebru arrived as a welfare of migrant from Eritrea to Sweden. …

    Gebru has not been able to give any concrete reasons for why he cut the throat of the seven-year girl in the bathroom of her home. He had previously been living in the apartment. What he did there on that day is unclear because according to some data he was not living there anymore. As the Court notes, however, he did live in the apartment when the murder was committed but Gebru had failed to pay rent.

    Gebru has stated that he had intended to take his own life but for unknown reasons instead stabbed the girl to death.”
  
http://10news.dk/?p=2165

----------------------------------------
Asylum Seeker convicted of knife murder of seven year old girl
 
MURDER Another brutal knife murder committed by an Eritrean asylum-seekers were given a few days ago its legal resolution. A seven year old girl was stabbed to death in an apartment in Upplands-Bro in northern Stockholm on 25 July this year of a 36 year old man, Daniel Gebru, ten months earlier arrived as the welfare of migrants to Sweden from Eritrea.

Gebru sentenced to psychiatric care with a special discharge review and be expelled indefinitely after already served and care. However, it is unclear if the expulsion will be enforceable, this is because the Migration Board believes that human rights are infringed in a way in Eritrea that allows no one can be deported there. Gebru is therefore likely to remain in Sweden after already served and care. There is also no minimum retention Gebru must be nurtured. If he is deemed to have frisknat to, he can be released after a very short time.

As with the brutal knife murder of IKEA in Västerås in August this year, including those committed by an Eritrean asylum seeker, has the offender as partial explanation for the crime stated mental disorder related to alleged harsh conditions in their home country and that migrants who should have led to his suffering by hallucinations and paranoia.

Gebru has not been able to give any other more concrete reasons for why he cut the throat of the seven-year girl in the bathroom of her home. He had previously been inherent in the apartment. What he did there on that particular day is unclear because according to some data did not live there anymore. The Court notes, however, he must have lived in the apartment where the murder was committed but have failed to pay the rent.

Gebru has stated that he had intended to take his own life but for unknown reasons instead stabbed the girl to death. He incurred but also themselves afterwards a cutting injury. The retrospective self-inflicted injury could of course have been a way to hide the real motive for the crime against the girl, but the court chose to go on the defense line in this part, that the murder was committed in a state of mental confusion and no real motive to the girl or order to conceal another crime against the girl.

Gebru sentenced accordingly - and because he exposed the girl of "unnecessary suffering" in connection with the murder - not formally of murder, but of manslaughter and not to prison but to care. However, you can not court so far as to completely absolve Gebru from liability for the actions, as claimed by the defense lawyers. The girl's parents are happy with the man convicted but dissatisfied with the crime of murder was not. Gebru must also pay compensation to the parents of 182 860 SEK and a further 61 705 paid to the estate.

The case provides a further alarm signal of irresponsibility with which asylum applications are dealt with in Sweden, how mentally unstable people are allowed to reside freely in society and what consequences this may have. Missing ID checks, sloppy research background of asylum seekers in their home country and naive faith in the asylum seekers' own oral evidence allows no one knows what kind of people are released into our country. It can be anything from people with actual refugee status through the economic welfare of migrants to serious criminals and terrorists.

Nor does this case - as one of the responsible politicians and other opinion leaders should be able to expect - led the public debate on security in society severely eroded due to serious deficiencies in the asylum reception. Few have the courage enough to step outside the politically correct view corridor and ask where the limits to how many in Sweden, we are ready to have murdered, abused, raped, mugged, robbed, deceived and subjected to other serious crimes without the conduct of mass immigration policy is questioned .

Attunda District Court, B 6126-15

http://archive.is/6PvR3

http://avpixlat.info/2015/12/28/asylsokare-domd-for-knivmord-pa-sjuarig-flicka/

----------------------------------------
COMMENT

The compensation custom does my head in, when it's associated with murder or rape crimes.




----------------------------------------
Europa-Evropa

Sweden - Mass Brawl - Migrant Centre

----------------------------------------
ARTICLE
----------------------------------------

One man is stabbed to death and three others are injured in latest mass brawl between gangs at Swedish migrant centre
  •     One man killed and three injured in fight at asylum centre in Sweden
  •     Two groups of asylum seekers clashed while resolving an argument
  •     One man, in his 20s, has been arrested on suspicion of murder
  •     Up to 15 people were involved in the fight, all from the same country

By Sara Malm for MailOnline

Published: 20:30 EST, 15 February 2016 | Updated: 22:10 EST, 15 February 2016

One man has been stabbed to death and three people injured after a mass brawl at an asylum centre in Sweden this weekend.

Police have arrested a man in his 20s on suspicion of murder after the incident in Ljusne, near Soderhamn, central Sweden, on Saturday.

More than a dozen male asylum seekers were involved in the knife fight, which is believed to have started when one group from a nearby centre visited the other to resolve a previous argument.

The fight between the two groups had reportedly started in central Soderhamn a few weeks earlier, and the intention was to meet and 'make peace'.

The men reportedly hail from Afghanistan, with one group living at an asylum centre in Soderhamn, and the other in Ljusne, less than ten miles apart.

'It's not a good thing to fight out on the town. We are all from the same country. So we wondered, "why should we fight?",' one of the injured men told HelaHalsingland.

He says around ten people living in Soderhamn went down to the Ljusne asylum housing on Saturday afternoon to meet with 'five or six' men who lived there to resolve the issue.

'We did not want to fight, and I thought they would listen to us. But they were prepared with knives - in the end they had eight or nine knives,' the unnamed victim told the paper.

'I was stabbed in the back when I was helping one of my friends who grabbed the arm of one of the guys who had a knife. Then I was stabbed several times in the back, but my jacket protected me.'

Police were called to the scene and arrested one man after carrying out a raid on one of the flats in the asylum centre, and three more were brought in for questioning and later released.

According to Soderhamn Police, up to 15 people were involved in the brawl, all men believed to be in their 20s.

This is the latest in a number of violent incidents to take place at asylum seeker centres in Sweden this year.

One incident last month saw police run for their lives after being attacked by a mob of asylum seekers at a refugee centre in Vasteras, central Sweden.

Police had been called in to help with the relocation of a ten-year-old boy who had reportedly been 'raped repeatedly by other asylum seekers at the centre.

It came just days after followed the murder of social worker Alexandra Mezher, 22, who was stabbed to death at a refugee centre in Molndal, near Gothenburg when she stepped in to stop a fight.

Swedish police have demanded more resources to stem rising violence linked to the migrant crisis.

Police spokesman Thomas Fuxborg said last month: ‘These kinds of calls are becoming more and more common.

‘We’re dealing with more incidents like these since the arrival of so many more refugees from abroad.’

Sweden took in more than 160,000 refugees and migrants in 2015, more than any other EU country per capita.

However, the number of newcomers has dropped dramatically after compulsory border-control ID checks were introduced last month. 


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3447576/One-man-stabbed-death-three-injured-latest-mass-brawl-gangs-Swedish-migrant-centre.html

----------------------------------------
COMMENT




----------------------------------------
Europa-Evropa

African Perpetrator(s) - Mannheim, Germany - 55-year-old assaulted

----------------------------------------
ARTICLE
----------------------------------------
Groped & beaten 55-year-old - Mannheim
http://archive.is/wwFXN
German to English Google Translation:


January 22, 2016 published by Hannah-Marie Beck Post Comment

Mannheim, January 22, 2016. (red / pol) On the way to January 15, a 55-year-old approached by an unidentified, black African man, pushed to a house wall, groped immoral and beaten in the abdomen with his fist be , Approximately ten other Africans who had previously dropped out with the perpetrator of a black van or minibus, will have the situation observed. The police are looking for a phantom according to witnesses.

Information of the Police Headquarters Mannheim:

"Victims of sexual assault was on Friday evening, 15 January 2016 55-year-old woman in Waldhof district.

The woman was against 19:40 of the Opole road on the way home, when she was approached at the corner Jakob-Faulhaber-Strasse / Huben road from an unidentified man and forced into the street Huben. There she was forced to a house wall, groped immoral and beaten in the abdomen with his fist.

The situation has been observed by several people, which apparently acted to companion of the perpetrator. The woman was finally able to escape to a nearby restaurant and to inform the police. An initiated immediately search for the perpetrator and his companions had passed without result.

With an identikit the police are now looking for the suspect, who is described as follows:

Circa 25-30 years; Black African; 175-180 cm; trained. He wore at the material time a gray hoodie, which was pulled over his head and a gray sweatpants. Striking at the fugitives are its teeth. The offender has big teeth that are quite far apart. However, the bite is not sketchy.

The companions of the offender, it should be a group of about ten or more also black Africans who previously dropped out of a black van or minibus.

Witnesses who hints fact, the perpetrator and possibly give at least ten companions his, are asked to get in touch with the Department of Criminal Sexual offenses Commissariat Mannheim, Tel .: 0621 / 174-5555. "
http://archive.is/wwFXN

original:
http://www.rheinneckarblog.de/22/55-jaehrige-begrapscht-und-geschlagen-polizei-fahndet-mit-phantombild/90531.html


----------------------------------------
COMMENT


----------------------------------------
Europa-Evropa

Invasion of Europe - Frank Salter - Political Ethologist

----------------------------------------
ARTICLE
----------------------------------------
AUDIO

ARTICLE
*Originally appeared on:
http://www.eurocanadian.ca/2016/01/germanys-jeopardy-could-immigrant-influx-end-european-civilization.html

Frank Salter
political ethologist


Introduction: Dire Predictions

My name is Frank Salter. I'm an Australian political ethologist, meaning that includes biological approaches when studying society and politics. I've spent much of my career researching at a Max Planck Institute in Germany, as well as teaching there and elsewhere in Europe and the United States. One of my research areas is ethnic solidarity and conflict and how this affects democratic welfare states.

In this talk I discuss the dire predictions that have been made about the massive influx of immigrants and refugees still entering Germany and other European countries from the Middle East, Africa and Asia. Many then fan-out, crossing Europe's old national borders which are no longer regulated due to the Schengen Agreement. Some believe this could end European civilization, despite the outpouring of goodwill and hospitality shown by millions of Germans and other Europeans. These predictions have not only come from anti-immigrant ideologues but from moderate politicians. An example is Tony Abbott, until recently Australian prime minister. Speaking in London, Abbott called on Europe to close its borders to avoid a "catastrophic error". He declared that protecting the borders will "require some force; it will require massive logistics and expense; it will gnaw at our consciences — yet it is the only way to prevent a tide of humanity surging through Europe and quite possibly changing it forever."1

Curiously, neither Abbott nor the other commentators explain why the influx would be so damaging. The same is true of Angela Merkel's argument for opening the borders. Where was the sober and transparent assessment of costs and benefits?

In this talk I attempt such an assessment, by reviewing research on the way that ethnic diversity tends to increase social conflict and crime, undermine welfare, exacerbate ethnic inequality, racialize politics and erode civil liberties. I then compare these costs with the benefits of mass Third World immigration asserted by Angela Merkel and her supporters.

Social Conflict

UK Race Riots 2011

Recent tragic events, including the attacks in Paris, make terrorism appear the most obvious and immediate threat. The overwhelming majority of incomers are Muslims. Though most Muslims are not terrorists, many terrorists are Muslims. In general, rising ethnic diversity increases the chance that one minority or another will oppose the government's foreign policy. Tragedy results if even a small number of disaffected individuals adopt violence.

However, terrorism is not the main harm likely to arise from the present immigration. The main effect will be to fracture the psychological bond of nationality, leaving citizenship a hollowed-out legalism. That is because rising diversity is associated not only with violence such as terrorism and civil war, but with a general loss of social cohesion. But let us begin with violence.

Data from numerous studies show that the more ethnically diverse a society the greater the risk of conflict and, conversely, the more difficult it is to forge unity. Civil conflict is less likely in more homogeneous societies. Academic researchers have attempted to quantify the risk.

In the 1990s a global study by Rudolf Rummel at the University of Hawaii measured how 109 variables contributed to collective violence of the extreme variety — guerrilla and civil war — between 1932 and 1982; that's a 50 year period. He found that one fifth of the variation in collective violence was caused by just one variable, the number of ethnic groups within the society. Conflict was made more intense when the antagonistic parties had different religions.2 That finding is obviously relevant to the present situation where Muslims are flooding into a largely Christian and secular Europe.

A study of contemporary societies by Finnish sociologist Tatu Vanhanen examined ethnic conflict defined more broadly to include discrimination, ethnic parties and interest groups, as well as ethnic violence and civil war. Vanhanen used evolutionary theory to hypothesize that diversity would cause conflict to rise. Among the 176 societies he studied, Vanhanen found that in 2010 two thirds of global variation in ethnic conflict was explained by ethnic diversity.3 In other words, much of the difference between united peaceful countries and those riven by ethnic conflict is the latters' ethnic diversity.

A related effect of diversity is lowered cooperation and "social capital", the extent to which people support each other. As heterogeneity grows, participation in clubs and volunteer work falls. People become more isolated and less trustful. The effect is strongest in local neighbourhoods where people experience different ethnic groups.4 In other words, it is not ignorance or isolation that cause ethnic discord, but contact with other cultures, including foreigners entering a homeland territory in large numbers.

German governments should be aware of the tendency of ethnic diversity to cause social conflict because that tendency has been studied in German research institutions. For example, ethologist Irenaeus Eibl-Eibesfeldt, a professor at the Max Planck Society, and colleagues such as Johan van der Dennen at the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, have for decades studied the effects of cultural mixing on ethnocentrism and xenophobia in mass anonymous societies. Both have warned that large scale mixing of different ethnicities reduces social stability and risks domestic peace.

Some of the research I've been discussing was inspired by evolutionary theory. This is an important approach long excluded from the social sciences. Human psychology evolved in the context of ethnically homogeneous groups. From this perspective the diversity now being imposed by modern elites is unnatural on the evolutionary time scale. That unnatural level of diversity is responsible for some of the conflict, according to evolutionary theory. Further confirmation of this evolutionary hypothesis is the finding that genetic diversity, as distinct from cultural diversity, correlates with social conflict. Since ethnic groups are pools of genetic similarity,5 mixing such pools increases genetic variation within a society and, according to new global research, causes greater social conflict.6

Stronger causes than genetic diversity are cultural, economic and historical factors, which help explain the surge of goodwill that Germans, Swedes and other Europeans showed Syrian refugees in 2015. But these factors can fluctuate greatly in the short term, while it can take many generations for genetic variation to fall.

More Crime

German victim of Muslim Gang Rape

Crime is social conflict in which the aggressor breaks the law. The track record of crime committed by non-Western immigrants to Europe is not reassuring.

A disturbing trend in France, which has Europe's largest Islamic population, is the growth of no-go areas where even police dare not venture except in force. In addition in France and Britain there are occasional riots so violent and extensive that police lose control. These periods of mass conflict amount to uprisings.

The trend is for parallel societies to be established as the immigrant populations from less compatible cultures segregate themselves and new generations come of age. Generous welfare and multiculturalism exacerbate immigrant crime, which often increases in the second generation.

Between 1997 and 2013 large scale organized sexual exploitation of White girls took place in the English town of Rotherham in South Yorkshire, predominantly by Muslim Pakistani men. Up to 1,400 girls as young as 12 years of age were raped and sex-trafficked by multiple men.

Sweden and Denmark also offer a glimpse of what Germany can expect from the intake of unselected immigrants coming from incompatible cultures. In Sweden the majority of those charged with murder, rape and robbery are immigrants, despite immigrants numbering only 16 per cent of the population.7

In Denmark immigrants from several countries commit crimes at a much higher rate than do ethnic Danes. This is especially true of immigrants from the Middle East and Africa.8 The greatest frequency of law-breaking was shown by the children of non-Western immigrants. Those aged 15-19 were overrepresented by 93 per cent, those aged 20-29 by 130 percent, and those aged 30-39 were overrepresented by 135 per cent. Ethnic Danes were underrepresented for all these age categories.

For Germany the data are less accessible but an unconfirmed report indicates that in 2011 asylum-seekers committed 3.3 per cent of all crimes, many times their proportion of the German population.9 By 2014 that already-high figure had jumped to 7.7 per cent of all crime. In the same period, the number of assaults and shoplifting across Germany more than doubled.10

Reduced Welfare

'
"Poverty in Germany at its Highest Since Reunification"

Obviously the influx of millions of poor people will strain welfare budgets. Europeans who have paid social security insurance their whole working lives will soon be supporting health, housing, unemployment and age benefits for millions who have never contributed. If the influx is not stopped, this will be the start of an astronomical transfer of wealth, while the system survives.

It might not survive long because most European governments are already heavily in debt and managing heavy welfare expenditures. In 2013, the last year for which data are available, general government gross debt in Austria was 81% of GDP, in Belgium 104%, France 92%, Germany 77%, Italy 128%, Spain 92%, and the United Kingdom 87%.11

In Sweden government debt is only about 39% of GDP but its immigrants from Africa and the Middle East are straining the budget. These immigrants make up about 16% of the population but take as much as 58% of welfare payments, representing a large wealth transfer from ethnic Swedes.12 That transfer is a bad investment because about 48% of working-age immigrants are unemployed. Even after 15 years in the country, 40% are not working.

But welfare is still more fragile than these figures indicate.

Research conducted at Germany's Max Planck Society indicates that ethnic change due to immigration will change taxpayers' motivation, reducing their willingness to support welfare. Comparison of welfare systems around the world shows that as ethnic diversity rises, welfare tends to decline.13

Not only welfare declines but any services relying on contributions to public goods. That includes cooperation with police, charities, medical and military authorities.

Foreign aid, which is international welfare, is even more fragile. Foreign aid is strongly and negatively correlated with donor countries' ethnic diversity.14

The irony could not be more cruel. By accepting large numbers of people of non-Western cultures, who are seeking to benefit from generous welfare, European countries not only risk losing domestic welfare for natives and immigrants alike, but reducing their foreign aid to immigrants' homelands. It's a lose-lose strategy.

Greater Ethnic Inequality

Ethnic inequality, a major cause of civil conflict, will increase as a result of the present influx. When an ethnic group fails to achieve income equality down the generations, the effect is deeply ingrained resentment and a low threshold for civil unrest. That might be why second generation immigrants often show higher criminality than their parents.

Once again there is no excuse for ignorance because Germany has its own native-born instructor on the causes of ethnic inequality. Thilo Sarrazin is an SPD politician and was, until 2010, board member of the Deutsche Bank, the year he published a book titled Germany Abolishes Itself: How We Risk Losing Our Country.15 Sarrazin documented the slow pace of integration of Turkish immigrants into German society and economy, their disproportionate reliance on government welfare and their higher fertility. He found that slow assimilation was caused by the Islamic religion and lower educational outcomes were caused by persistent ethnic tradition.16 When he wrote this, Angela Merkel was already German Chancellor. She condemned Sarrazin and endorsed his removal from the Deutsche Bank board, an omen of her 2015 radicalism and intolerance.

It is certain that the present influx will escalate ethnic stratification in Germany and in Europe. If this were only due to poor languages skills and low education, the inequality could close within a generation or two (still an appalling assault on the receiving societies). But many of the immigrants come from populations with long records of poor educational and economic performance, likely to result in chronic ethnic stratification reminiscent of despotic empires.17 By importing a new underclass, Germany and Europe are abolishing their egalitarian national societies.

Racialized Politics

Turks protesting "Nazi terror", "job discrimination" and "daily racism" in Germany

An open door policy is advocated by self-proclaimed anti-racists such as Angela Merkel and her allies on the far left. The "anti-fa" protesters who shout-down PEGIDA and other conservatives take it for granted that borders should be open to all comers. But one certain outcome of the new immigrant influx is the further racialization of politics and growing demographic pressure on ethnic Europeans. Racialization will take the form of sectarianism, ethnic parties, multiculturalism, school indoctrination, political correctness and affirmative action — discrimination meant to equalise outcomes. Racialized politics is already a fact of life in diverse societies such as Britain, France, the United States and Australia.

Throughout recorded history societies controlled immigration, especially when it involved large numbers. Angela Merkel's and Francois Hollande's open door policy is a reckless social experiment that is already inducing compassion fatigue. Nationalist and anti-immigration parties are rising in Austria, Belgium, Britain, Denmark, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Sweden, and Switzerland.

The ethnic inequality discussed earlier is an important cause of racialization. By the second generation poorer immigrant groups, especially those that are culturally or racially visible, become susceptible to radicalization by ideologies that legitimate grievances. These ideologies help immigrants rationalise their low socioeconomic status and sense of alienation by making them out to be victims of White racism. The ideologies are acquired from universities, schools, the media, social workers, politicians and ethnic leaders.

Victimhood ideologies also produce guilt and fear in Whites, by linking their ethnic identities — and only theirs — to extremism and fascism.18 This is unfair because White majorities are typically less ethnocentric than minorities.

The myth of minority victimhood conditions the White majority to accept replacement-level immigration. These doctrines have been influential in English-speaking countries and much of Western Europe since the cultural revolution of the 1960s and 1970s.

Meanwhile in Germany immigration politics has started in the non-democratic mode typical of ethnic politics throughout the West. No referendum is planned to give Germans a choice concerning their destiny. With minor exceptions, citizens do not even have the option of voting against the open door policy in a normal election, because the major parties support open borders. Germans who wish to have a say in immigration policy must vote for new parties that have not yet been captured by special interests.

Reduced Civil Liberties

Merkel discussing ways to limit "anti-immigrant" views with Facebook founder Zuckerberg

Rising diversity undermines civil rights. Wherever the founding ethnic group has lost control of immigration, governments come under pressure from the political left and their minority clients to suppress "hate speech", which can include statements of opinion and fact. The limiting of free speech also precedes and helps cause the rise of replacement level immigration. But certainly it is also an effect of diversity.

Restrictions of speech have a chilling effect on public debate. The millions now flooding into Germany and Europe are beneficiaries of this repression. Their presence will only increase pressure on government to crack down on restless natives. The underlying reason for the crackdown will be the rise of massive endemic social conflict, wholly predictable and indeed predicted by social scientists.

Benefits? Arguments for Open Borders

Are these costs outweighed by the benefits proposed by Angela Merkel and her supporters? Six main arguments have been advanced to persuade Germans to accept the influx:

The first argument is Merkel's claim that Germany and Europe are morally obliged to settle genuine refugees. There is obviously a moral duty to help but the argument that refugees must be settled in Europe fails for two simple reasons. Firstly, many of the incomers are not refugees but economic immigrants. Secondly, the heavy costs imposed by the influx on native Germans means that a moral policy must optimise the two sides' interests, not maximize immigrant welfare at the expense of the host society. After all, the first duty of governments, especially in democracies, is to protect their constituents. Germany and the EU could be helping refugees in or near their own countries.

The second argument is Merkel's claim that Germany will benefit by throwing off its Nazi legacy once and for all. This is a despicable argument because Germans are innocent of genocide, unless one accepts the Nazi doctrine of collective racial guilt. The opposite effect is more likely. Vilification of ethnic Germans could intensify because Merkel has launched a new era of racialized politics in which exponents of mass Third World immigration will use any victimhood narrative to silence the majority.

The third argument was stated by the German Interior Minister in mid September 2015.19 He claimed that the government had no choice but to accept any number of refugees because Article 16a, paragraph 1, of the German constitution, the Grundgesetz, states that "Persons persecuted on political grounds shall have the right of asylum." This is a strictly legalistic argument because, as we have seen, there is no moral duty to settle large numbers of refugees in Germany. So let's look more closely at the law. Paragraph 2 of Article 16a of the Grundgesetz states that paragraph 1 does not apply to persons entering the Federal Republic "from a member state of the European Communities".20 The overwhelming majority of refugees entering Germany have come via other EU states. Germany was entitled to prevent them entering but the Merkel government suspended the Dublin Regulation, which requires asylum seekers to be returned to the European country of first arrival.21 How could Germany have accepted this EU law in the first place if it contradicted the German constitution? If, on the other hand, the Dublin Regulation reflects article 16a of the constitution, how could it be so easily suspended?22 Clearly Germany and the EU can legally protect their borders. It is Merkel and other EU leaders who allowed the influx, not any law.

The fourth argument was advanced by Merkel and Mercedes CEO Dieter Zetsch, who maintained that the refugees will make productive workers. Zetsch stated: "They could, like the guest workers from decades ago, help us preserve and improve our prosperity. For Germany cannot any more fill the jobs available." This is utopian speculation that runs counter to precedent and knowledge of cultural differences. More likely, Germany will be burdened by immigrant communities suffering high unemployment and concentrated in low productivity unskilled jobs.

The fifth argument is even more radical. It was stated by demographer Stephan Sievert, of the Berlin Institute for Population and Development. Sievert optimistically stated that Germany's population was at last growing, after decades of stagnation.23 Sievert does not admit that his implied policy entails the rapid demographic replacement of the German ethnic family, in effect cultural genocide by stages. If the German people were given the opportunity to vote on this policy, perhaps a majority would agree with German author Botho Strauss, who declared that he prefers to live among his own people even if they are falling in numbers, rather than live in an imposed cultural mix.24

A sixth argument has been offered by Merkel, in her New Year's address for 2016. It is the open border mantra, that immigration is generally good. Merkel stated that "countries have always benefited from successful immigration, both economically and socially".25 It is a danger sign when highly educated people resort to tautologies, such as deducing that successful immigration is successful. In fact immigrant societies — America, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, France, and others — are all well down the track of turning their founding cultures into minorities without ever offering them a democratic choice. Merkel also followed the usual pro-immigration line by accusing her critics of "coldness or even hatred", implying that she is motivated by warmer emotions. And she foreshadowed a new inclusive definition of what it means to be German, which is a prudent move for someone intent on demographic transformation. Omitted from this latest statement, but likely to follow, are other elements of the pro-immigration mantra, such as diversity is strength, or German identity is the same as citizenship, or school children must be educated in tolerance, or immigrants rescue German culture from its white-bread impoverishment. These arguments and assertions are completely normal in Western societies whose political classes have opened them to mass immigration.

These six alleged benefits of massive unselected immigration are typical of the intellectual level of open border arguments elsewhere in Western countries. That such shallow and sometimes mendacious rhetoric is uttered by intelligent individuals would be impossible without their near monopoly of media access resulting from the ideological intolerance that has suppressed open debate for decades.

Conclusion: Jeopardy — Will Europe Survive?

The evidence just reviewed indicates that dire warnings are not overstated. The ethnic transformation now being inflicted on Germany and the rest of Europe by its political class, if continued, will severely damage European culture and way of life. The opposed arguments are flimsy and fail entirely to address the perceived risks. Commentators are not exaggerating then they warn that European civilization, the result of three millennia of cultural evolution, is in jeopardy.

Hopefully common sense will prevail and journalists and politicians will listen respectfully to the people's concerns and aspirations. Perhaps Merkel and Hollande will recover from their moral mania and free themselves from special interests long enough to deign the flood to recede. Perhaps the EU will formulate a conservative immigration policy, one that does not cater mainly to the interests of immigrants, minorities and the corporate sector but also respects Europeans by preserving their identities, cultures, domestic peace, equality and national cohesion. It is more likely that voters will solve the problem than Europe's intellectually corrupt political class, and that new parties will be granted the power to reclaim national sovereignty from the failed EU project. In that case the EU will collapse, as individual nations move to protect themselves from the Schengen Agreement, now become a mortal threat instead of a promise. That could form the basis for a new trans-European movement that protects the identities and ways of life of individual nations and Europe as a whole.

But until now these considerations have been foreign to Angela Merkel and her supporters. She sells her open door policy as humanitarian. But in reality this is a cruel policy likely to produce suffering across Germany and Europe. She has failed to consider the interests of individual European nations or of Europe as a whole. Europe's political class has, in effect, embraced the most aggressive form of multiculturalism, in which the establishment forms an alliance with minorities to dominate the majority.

The suffering the open door policy will bring — the inequality, including the special evil of ethnic stratification, the collapse of welfare, the crime, the slums and no-go areas, the degradation of women, the racialization of politics, the decline in wages, the loss of national cohesion, the growing sense of loss and alienation among Germans and immigrants alike, the accelerated replacement of Europeans in their ancient homelands, the constriction of civil rights and the pervasive chaos — all of this will last for generations.

Merkel is doubly cruel because she is stripping developing societies of their more educated and industrious people. The inevitable fall in European foreign aid will hurt poor countries around the world, caused by the stagnation of European economies and decline in social capital.

A responsible policy would resemble the British strategy of helping refugees in or near their own countries while restricting their immigration to Europe, though it should be noted that in Britain non-refugee immigration is out of control.

For Germany the situation is more threatening due to its toxic political culture, despite its present low level of ethnic diversity. The country's chances of recovery — which means adopting a sustainable immigration policy — depend on how the following questions are answered by events.

How long will it take for the present reaction to become a powerful political force? How long before Germany's leadership feels the wrath of a people enraged at the prospect of the transformation of their country? And should the reaction become intense, will citizens remain mobilised long enough to build political organisations sufficiently powerful to correct the situation? Will they be able to inflict political censure on Merkel and the political class so stark that it neutralises the incentives offered by the establishment? Will they be able to do so in the teeth of relentless attacks from the mainstream media and educational establishments? Will they stay focused long enough to renegotiate EU arrangements or withdraw Germany from them? Will they persist long enough to push through constitutional amendments that define Germany as the homeland of the German people and allow legal redress against leaders who attempt demographic replacement?

Whether or not there is a pause in the influx, Germans and other Europeans should educate themselves about the deep causes of this disaster and how to prevent its recurrence. 


Frank Salter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Salter

Website
http://socialtechnologies.com.au/

----------------------------------------
COMMENT

Video/Audio appears to cover the above article (so far).

Article worthwhile reading.



----------------------------------------
Europa-Evropa